Want to Choose Your Lawyer? Good Luck in Iran
Only 20 Lawyers to Defend People Accused of Political, Security Crimes in Tehran
Iran's national flags are seen on a square in Tehran February 10, 2012.
© 2012 Reuters |
Iran’s judiciary reportedly created a very short
list of lawyers approved to represent people accused of national security
crimes – commonly used to prosecute activists – in Tehran’s courts during the
investigative stage of the case. Of the 20,000-plus members of Tehran’s Bar
association, only 20 lawyers made the list, which, unsurprisingly, excluded
women and human rights lawyers.
Tehran lawyer Amir Raeesian on Saturday tweeted that
authorities told him and his colleagues that if their name is not on the list,
they cannot represent anyone charged with political or security crimes. His
name is not on the list.
Iran’s 2014 criminal procedure law originally sought
to expand detainees’ rights, including access to a lawyer. Yet an altered
version of the law that went into force requires those charged with various
offenses, including “national or international security crimes, political and
media crimes,” select their counsel from a judiciary-approved pool of lawyers
during the investigation.
Yet no list was approved over the past four years.
During this time, Human Rights Watch documented a consistent pattern of
prosecutors refusing to allow such detainees’ access to lawyer during the
investigative phase.
Additionally, revolutionary court judges occasionally
refused to accept detainees’ lawyers of choice during the trial.
This is just one more example of Iran’s judiciary
trampling over due process. Iran has consistently failed to prevent torture in detention and to
investigate allegations of such abuse – even several deaths in detention.
Revolutionary courts
use confessions obtained under torture as evidence.
In February, the family of Kavous Seyed Emami, a prominent environmentalist and
a university professor who had been arrested, wrote on social media that
authorities told them Seyed Emami had “committed suicide” in detention. No
independent investigation has been conducted into his death.
International law guarantees anyone accused of a
crime access to a lawyer of their choice at all stages of criminal proceedings,
including during the investigation, the pretrial proceedings, and during the
trial itself. Announcing a list of approved lawyers based on non-transparent
criteria is just the latest example of judiciary’s interference with detainees’
rights.
The right to access a
lawyer of your choosing is one of the most important safeguards against abuses
in detention. Yet like other rights, Iran’s judiciary is busy eroding laws
designed to protect Iranian citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment